have these folks actually purchased a vehicle in the past 20 years... used raptors are still more then my rebel :/
If the reader is not familiar with the base 1500, this insight means nothing, because the author himself is clearly not familiar with it. He just heard it was so. What mechanical changes were needed, but not delivered? What stayed the same that hinders the performance? I don't think he's even familiar with the Raptor, as he talks almost exclusively about its looks rather than performance.They’re the same parts that you’ll find in other Rams, where apparently they’re slouching. There are no other mechanical changes.
This reads like typical music-review exaggeration ("this album literally sounds like a bag of cats yelling to get out"). It's also completely contradicted by the Cars.com Rebel vs Tundra TRD Pro video.If that were actually the case, though, the tread design would be smeared, because the Toyos rarely meet a throttle application they don’t turn into positive slip.
that's what i've seen lately a lot of positive reviews in winter.The reason I bought the rebel is because I live in the country and in the winter we get big snow dumps. Have to say I am very pleased how it has handled the winter this year. Love it.
It was a terrible review. Too many reviews of too many things have been subverted by this hipster snark nonsense. If C&D paid the author, they could've saved a few bucks and just asked a teenager which truck he thought looked better and gotten the same review.
The negatives in this review are implied, not detailed. I don't have a Rebel, but I'm thinking about getting one, and I would like to read about its potential flaws as well as its positives. In this review, the author seldom approaches specific negatives. Here's one of the few instances:
If the reader is not familiar with the base 1500, this insight means nothing, because the author himself is clearly not familiar with it. He just heard it was so. What mechanical changes were needed, but not delivered? What stayed the same that hinders the performance? I don't think he's even familiar with the Raptor, as he talks almost exclusively about its looks rather than performance.
This seems like specific criticism:
This reads like typical music-review exaggeration ("this album literally sounds like a bag of cats yelling to get out"). It's also completely contradicted by the Cars.com Rebel vs Tundra TRD Pro video.
The rest of the review is weird Raptor worship. There's no attempt at all to explain why the Raptor is better suited to a task than the Rebel, just plenty of insistence that it is. If someone is looking to make a $50-60k decision between the two vehicles, he'll find no information in this "review."